Skip to content
Back to blog
Lancartech Team 4 min read

PostgreSQL vs MongoDB vs SQLite: Picking a Database in 2026

Decision matrix from many projects — when PostgreSQL wins, when MongoDB fits, and why SQLite is increasingly viable for small-to-mid SaaS.

PostgreSQL vs MongoDB vs SQLite: Picking a Database in 2026

TL;DR

  • PostgreSQL — our default for most projects. ACID, JSONB, RLS, built-in full-text search.
  • MongoDB — when the schema truly is dynamic (CMS, content stores), distributed sharding.
  • SQLite — embedded, edge, replicated with Litestream/LiteFS. Increasingly valid for production small-to-mid SaaS.

Performance — Insert + simple-query workload

Single-row insert per second (NVMe SSD, fsync on) SQLite (WAL) ~50K ips PostgreSQL ~30K ips MongoDB ~22K ips MySQL InnoDB ~25K ips

Single instance, basic schema, no network round-trip. Real workloads can differ wildly.

Feature matrix

FeaturePostgreSQLMongoDBSQLite
ACID transactions✅ (since 4.0)
JSON/document✅ JSONB indexable✅ native BSON✅ JSON1 ext
Full-text search✅ tsvector✅ text indexes✅ FTS5
Row-Level Security❌ (app-level)❌ (app-level)
Geospatial✅ PostGIS✅ 2dsphere✅ R*Tree
Replication✅ logical + physical✅ replica set✅ Litestream / LiteFS
Shardingmanual partitioning / Citus✅ nativen/a (single file)
Embedded

When to pick PostgreSQL

  • Standard SaaS with many relationships.
  • SQL-based reporting + analytics.
  • Multi-tenant with Row-Level Security.
  • Mixed workloads (transactions + analytics).
  • Our default for most projects.

When to pick MongoDB

  • Truly dynamic schema (CMS user-generated content, comment trees).
  • Document-heavy (embedded sub-documents, no joins needed).
  • Horizontal scale from day one (native sharding).
  • Team familiar with the JS/JSON ecosystem.

Note: MongoDB is often “adopted because trendy”, but most use cases actually fit PostgreSQL JSONB. When in doubt, start with Postgres — far more flexible later.

When to pick SQLite — the underrated choice

In 2026 SQLite is increasingly valid for production SaaS because:

  1. Litestream / LiteFS for live replication to S3-compatible object stores.
  2. WAL mode allows many concurrent readers + 1 writer — enough for 90% of small-to-mid SaaS.
  3. No network round-trip — the DB is on the same disk as the app. Microsecond latency.
  4. Easy backups — copy a file. No pg_dump ritual.
  5. MIT-style licensing — clean.

Modern tools that make SQLite production-ready:

  • Turso — managed SQLite with global edge replicas.
  • Cloudflare D1 — SQLite in an edge worker.
  • Litestream — backup + replication to S3.
  • LiteFS (Fly.io) — distributed SQLite.

Best for: multi-tenant SaaS with one DB per tenant, edge apps, fast prototypes.

Lancartech’s choices

Use casePick
Lancartech BillingPostgreSQL
Tokora multi-tenant e-commercePostgreSQL + RLS
Splay API content cachePostgreSQL JSONB
Internal admin toolingSQLite + Litestream
Edge-worker key-valueCloudflare KV or D1
Time-series metricsPostgreSQL + TimescaleDB or ClickHouse
LoggingClickHouse or Loki

Rule of thumb

Default to PostgreSQL. Consider SQLite for small SaaS + edge. MongoDB only if the schema is truly dynamic and the team is already expert.

Database architecture consult.

Lancartech Team · · 4 min read

Ready to start your next project?

Initial consultation is free — let's design a digital strategy that fits your business.